|
When
the logic of history hungers for bread and we hand out a stone, we are
at pains to explain how much the stone resembles bread. I now describe
some of the stones which serve in lieu of a land ethic.
One
basic weakness in a conservation system based wholly on economic
motives is that most members of the land community have no economic
value. Wildflowers and songbirds are examples. Of the 22,000 higher
plants and animals native to Wisconsin, it is doubtful whether more
than 5 per cent can be sold, fed, eaten, or otherwise put to economic
use. Yet these creatures are members of the biotic community, and if
(as I believe) its stability depends on its integrity, they are
entitled to continuance.
When
one of these non-economic categories is threatened, and if we happen to
love it, we invent subterfuges to give it economic importance. At the
beginning of the century songbirds were supposed to be disappearing.
Ornithologists jumped to the rescue with some distinctly shaky evidence
to the effect that insects would eat us up if birds failed to control
them. The evidence had to be economic in order to be valid.
It
is painful to read these circumlocutions today. We have no land ethic
yet, but we have at least drawn nearer the point of admitting that
birds should continue as a matter of biotic right, regardless of the
presence or absence of economic advantage to us.
A
parallel situation exists in respect of predatory mammals, raptorial
birds, and fish-eating birds. Time was when biologists somewhat
overworked the evidence that these creatures preserve the health of
game by killing weaklings, or that they control rodents for the farmer,
or that they prey only on the "worthless" species. Here again, the
evidence had to be economic in order to be valid. It is only in recent
years that we hear the more honest argument that predators are members
of the community, and that no special interest has the right to
exterminate them for the sake of benefit, real or fancied, to itself.
Unfortunately this enlightened view is still in the talk stage. In the
field the extermination of predators goes merrily on: witness the
impending erasure of the timber wolf by fiat of Congress, the
Conservation Bureaus, and many state legislatures.
Aldo Leopold, from "The Land Ethic", in the Sand County Almanac, with essays on conservation from Round River, and published by Oxford University Press (1966). For
more information about Aldo Leopold, see: www.aldoleopold.org.
An inexpensive paperback version of Sand County Almanac published by
Ballantine Books is widely available at book stores or on-line.
|